this question comes up constantly in MMA circles and the answer is more nuanced than people think.
folkstyle (american collegiate wrestling):
- emphasizes riding time, top control, escapes, and returning opponent to mat
- the most relevant to MMA ground control. if you want to hold someone down and ground and pound, folkstyle is your base
- downside: the bottom position in folkstyle (referee's position) doesnt exist in MMA so some skills dont transfer
- example fighters: Colby Covington, Kamaru Usman, Henry Cejudo
freestyle:
- emphasizes explosiveness, throws, and exposure (turning opponent's back to mat)
- the best for takedowns in MMA because freestyle takedowns are dynamic and translate directly to the cage
- the scrambling in freestyle is incredibly useful for MMA transitions
- less bottom position work which means less ground control but better takedown offense
- example fighters: Khabib Nurmagomedov (sambo is basically freestyle+), Daniel Cormier
greco-roman:
- upper body throws and clinch work only. no leg attacks
- the clinch work translates DIRECTLY to the cage. dirty boxing and cage clinch positions are greco territory
- the throws are spectacular and devastating in MMA — a greco throw onto a canvas is brutal
- downside: no leg attacks limits the takedown options
- example fighters: Randy Couture, Matt Lindland
my ranking for MMA:
- freestyle — best overall MMA transfer
- folkstyle — best for control and top game
- greco — best for clinch and cage work but limited in other areas
the real answer: train all three and pull from each what works in MMA. the best MMA wrestlers (Khabib, Islam) blend all three styles seamlessly.
what do DFW fighters and coaches think?
greco for the clinch is underappreciated. when fighters are on the cage and fighting for position, thats pure greco-roman technique. Randy Couture built a hall of fame career on greco in MMA